Contact Us    Sitemap    Search

 

» PRODUCTS > FASTFOOT® > PROJECTS

"NOBODY BUILDS FLIMSY LIKE I DO", RON BUDGELL BLOGS ON FINE HOMEBUILDING
 

Overview of the Craft project before pouring concrete. Note the Fastfoot® footing form in place.

Ron Budgell, an experienced builder in Prospect Bay, Nova Scotia, has been building and renovating since 1980. His first ICF project was in 1995, and it was a radical construction method at the time.

Ron has used five or six different ICF blocks, with this project being formed with IntegraSpec®. This 3,000 square foot project on two floors was designed by Paul Skerry of Paul Skerry and Associates Limited, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

This was Ron's first footing with Fastfoot® and he was pleased because it enhanced his reputation of "Nobody builds flimsy like I do!"

Fab-Form's President, Rick Fearn, reminds Ron that fabric may be 'flimsy', but it's strong, sustainable and healthy.

His comments appear on the Fine Homebuilding blog (click on link below), entitled "Nobody Builds Flimsy Like I Do":

http://forums.taunton.com/tp-breaktime/messages/?msg=104945.1

The blog is repeated below for your convenience.

Photo Gallery -  Nobody Builds Flimsy Like I Do  Unsubscribe  
 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 2:30 pm 
To:  ALL  (1 of 67) 
  104945.1 
I started a new ICF house last week.

The architect told me he had recently seen a new product which looked interesting - fabric forms for footings. My initial reaction was that that was ridiculous, but when I thought about how I am perfectly happy to pour 11 or 12 feet of concrete into forms made of foam, it no longer seemed quite so silly.

Check out the manufacturer here: http://www.fab-form.com/ They have some very interesting ideas.

I don't own lumber suitable for footing forms at this point. I would have had to buy about 500' of rough 2 x 10 for this job, costing over $1000. Most of that could be salvaged, of course, but some would be consumed and not reusable. Anyway, I don't want to have to carry all that stuff around or store it.

The fabric form material to do the same job costs $170 plus material for stakes and stringers. The 2 x 4 stringers are almost all reusable. I would have used the stakes anyway.

Here's what a framework for a fabric form looks like

We built the outer rim first. leveling with a transit and an autolevel.

Then we built the inner rim, leveling from the outer with an ordinary spirit level

We had a variation in depth in the excavation of almost 10", requiring a very deep footing at the deepest point

We started this job with no electricity, but the power people showed up mid week.


Edited 5/24/2008 2:39 pm by ronbudgell
- Attachments follow -

1_sunroom_rim.jpg

239KB

2_inner_and_outer_rims.jpg

284KB

3_rims_complete.jpg

283KB
 
   Options  Reply  
 
From:  basswood   May-24 2:34 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (2 of 67) 
  104945.2 in reply to 104945.1 
Cool Ron,

Have you poured yet?

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 2:41 pm 
To:  basswood  (3 of 67) 
  104945.3 in reply to 104945.2 
Basswood,

Poured it Friday. Coming up!

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 2:51 pm 
To:  ALL  (4 of 67) 
  104945.4 in reply to 104945.2 
So here's the footing form material, two rolls of 120' each

We unrolled this and simply stapled it to the top of the light framework. It's a little slack in the framework so it can bulge some when full of concrete.

Going around corners, the material is folded as neatly as possible, not cut. Think Christmas present corners.

The straight run of formwork is amazingly easy and fast, but at this point, I'm looking at the depth we have to pour and beginning to get worried

- Attachments follow -

4_form_material.jpg

101KB

6_around_the_bend.jpg

290KB

5_installing_fabric.jpg

257KB
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 3:00 pm 
To:  ALL  (5 of 67) 
  104945.5 in reply to 104945.4 
But there is plenty to do to take my mind of what I disaster I might be getting myself into. I have to build footing steps. I hate building footing steps.

 

It can be fun in an odd way to scribe form material to the dirt though an inch or so here or there is of no account.

- Attachments follow -

7_steps.jpg

301KB

8_steps.jpg

258KB

9_steps.jpg

257KB
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 3:05 pm 
To:  ALL  (6 of 67) 
  104945.6 in reply to 104945.5 
So here it is, almost ready to pour. The steel is in it, the cross ties are installed, we've checked levels, we've located corners for later placement of vertical steel bar. I suppose the only thing not ready when I took this shot, last Thursday, was my head.

- Attachments follow -

14_almost_ready.jpg

249KB
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 3:17 pm 
To:  ALL  (7 of 67) 
  104945.7 in reply to 104945.6 
We poured late Friday morning in the rain. I was guiding the dirty end of the pump, wound up like a tight spring, watching for something to burst. Nothing even creaked! I managed to relax, as much as I can when pouring, and begin to treat this like just another job. As far as I know right now, it was a flawless pour.

On Monday, we'll take the forms apart and check levels again. Something might have moved when the concrete went into the forms, but I didn't see much movement. I might even go over there tomorrow and see how it turned out.

So here's what it looks like full of mud.

 

I like this FabForm. Do more with less material.

- Attachments follow -

15_full_of_mud_.jpg

257KB

16_full_of_mud_.jpg

258KB
 
   Options  Reply  

 

 
From:  McDesign   May-24 3:44 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (8 of 67) 
  104945.8 in reply to 104945.7 
Unbelieveable!

So cool!

Forrest

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  brownbagg   May-24 4:13 pm 
To:  McDesign  (9 of 67) 
  104945.9 in reply to 104945.8 
we alway just dig a trench in the ground, who cares if the footers are not pretty
 
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  Jay123   May-24 4:18 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (10 of 67) 
  104945.10 in reply to 104945.7 
Very cooool.

J

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  MikeSmith   May-24 4:19 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (11 of 67) 
  104945.11 in reply to 104945.9 
ron... thanks for the photo essay
Mike Smith Rhode Island : Design / Build / Repair / Restore
 
   Options  Reply  

 

 
From:  gordsco   May-24 4:24 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (12 of 67) 
  104945.12 in reply to 104945.7 
Ron, that is amazing! What were the odds of finding a place in NS you could drive stakes in line?

Except for the steps and assuming there is proper drainage, the footing will essentially not wick water into the foundation?

 
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  bobbys   May-24 4:28 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (13 of 67) 
  104945.13 in reply to 104945.1 
thats amazing.

Im curious on how you strip the forms now.

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 4:50 pm 
To:  brownbagg  (14 of 67) 
  104945.14 in reply to 104945.9 
brownbagg,

I'm not looking for pretty. I'm looking for vertical variation of no more than 1/8" from perfect. Once or twice I've gotten lucky and actually achieved that.

Ron

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 4:53 pm 
To:  gordsco  (15 of 67) 
  104945.15 in reply to 104945.12 
Gordie,

The stakes didn't go in very deep. It's bloody hard under there.

Your point about the water not being able to wick into the foundation walls is also made by the manufacturer. I think it's a very valuable quality and hard to achieve otherwise.

Ron

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 4:55 pm 
To:  bobbys  (16 of 67) 
  104945.16 in reply to 104945.13 
bobbys

I'm curious, too. I don't think any of the wood is trapped, though. I'll let you know.

Ron

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 4:59 pm 
To:  MikeSmith  (17 of 67) 
  104945.17 in reply to 104945.11 
McDesign, Jay, Mike,

Thanks

Ron

 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  stevent1   May-24 5:46 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (18 of 67) 
  104945.18 in reply to 104945.17 
Ron,

Thanx for sharing.
I'll stay tuned.

Chuck S

live, work, build, ...better with wood
 
   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  gordsco   May-24 5:46 pm 
To:  ronbudgell  (19 of 67) 
  104945.19 in reply to 104945.15 
Building Science had something to say about damp proofing the top of the footing or covering it with a membrane before setting the foundation forms.

Brian, "Experienced", enlightened me about wicking when I was quizing him about moisture control regarding finishing my basement. Prior to that, I was oblivious.

Whether or not this is an issue for ICF  foundations would depend on the forms being XPS or EPS.

The scenery looks rugged, you building close to home?

 

   Options  Reply  
   

 

 
From:  ronbudgell   May-24 6:04 pm 
To:  gordsco  (20 of 67) 
  104945.20 in reply to 104945.19 
Gordie,

I can't see the difference between XPS and EPS in terms of wicking moisture. It's through the concrete, not the foam. The exterior of the wall is normally sealed with a non-breathing membrane like Blueskin, so the foam is not the issue.

Anyway, there was only one XPS ICF form that I ever heard of and it was a disaster. I built one basement with it, so I know.

I have tried adding a separation sheet on top of the footing before building up with ICF, but it always seems to move or tear or something.

The site is about ten minutes drive away from home a little further out the bay in a subdivision where I've built two other ICF houses. Waterfront.

Ron

 

TOP
 
1-888-303-3278

©2008 Fab-Form Industries Ltd. All rights reserved
Registered trademarks are the property of Fab-Form Industries Ltd.